Comparing Drata and Thoropass

---

About Drata

Drata is a compliance platform that automates evidence collection and testing for security frameworks like SOC 2, ISO, and HIPAA. It connects to many systems to gather audit evidence automatically and includes features like control mapping, risk registers, and a portal where companies can share their compliance status. The platform handles much of the preparation work, but when it comes time for the actual audit, companies still need to coordinate separately with their auditor, which can involve manual work and misaligned expectations. While Drata markets an auditor directory, it's essentially a referral list rather than integrated audit support.

About Thoropass

Thoropass combines compliance automation with audit services in a single platform. The software collects evidence automatically from integrations, maps controls across multiple frameworks like SOC 2 and ISO 27001, and includes built-in auditors rather than requiring you to find separate audit firms. It handles the full compliance process from initial setup through completed audits, with features for policy templates, continuous monitoring, and security questionnaire automation. The platform appears designed for mid-market companies that want to avoid managing multiple vendors for compliance and audit work.

What do users say?

We've used AI to analyze a number of reviews from third-party sites like G2, Reddit, and Capterra, and here's what the AI found:

Based on reviews, Drata users appreciate its intuitive interface, strong automation for evidence collection, and excellent customer support with responsive live chat. Users highlight significant time savings from reduced manual compliance work, continuous monitoring capabilities, and good integrations with existing tools. However, some users report technical issues with the platform, complexity in initial setup, re-work during audit, and higher pricing compared to alternatives.

Based on reviews, Thoropass is praised by users for its comprehensive all-in-one compliance solution that combines automation capabilities with integrated audit services, helping organizations achieve compliance efficiently with strong customer support. Users consistently highlight the platform's ease of use, intuitive interface, clear dashboards, and seamless integrations that streamline compliance processes. The platform is valued for its dedicated compliance managers, quick implementation times, and partnership approach that provides comprehensive guidance throughout the compliance journey.

Comparison

Drata

Based on reviews, Drata offers deep automation and time savings through robust integrations, with users appreciating its intuitive interface and continuous monitoring capabilities. However, the handoff between the compliance platform and auditor often comes with misalignment of expectations and test procedures, resulting in extra manual work, and users report setup complexity and higher costs at scale.

Thoropass

Based on reviews, Thoropass provides an all-in-one experience combining compliance automation with built-in audit execution, earning strong G2 momentum with users praising its comprehensive guidance and partnership approach. The main drawbacks noted are opaque pricing structures and costs that vary significantly by framework and organizational scope.

Feature Comparison

Category	Drata	Thoropass
Audit Integration	N	Y
Evidence Automation	Y	Y
Multi-Framework Support	Y	Y
Built-in Auditor	N	Y
Trust Center	Y	Y
Continuous Monitoring	Y	Y
AI-Powered Reviews	N	Y
Pentesting Services	N	Y

Audit Integration

Drata operates as a compliance automation platform that connects users to third-party auditors through its Audit Hub feature. While this provides collaboration tools for working with external auditors, it still requires managing separate relationships and can result in misaligned expectations between the platform's preparation work and the auditor's testing procedures. The handoff process often involves manual coordination work despite the platform's automation capabilities.

Thoropass embeds audit services directly into the platform, functioning as both the compliance automation tool and the auditing firm. As an AICPA peer-reviewed CPA firm with PCI QSAC and HITRUST accreditation, Thoropass eliminates the typical handoff issues by having auditors work within the same system used for evidence collection and compliance management. This unified approach reduces double-work and ensures alignment between platform capabilities and audit requirements.

Evidence Automation

Drata provides automated evidence collection through hundreds of native integrations across cloud platforms, HRIS systems, and development tools. The platform continuously monitors controls and gathers audit evidence automatically, significantly reducing manual compliance work. However, this automation is focused on preparation, and evidence may still require additional review or reformatting when transitioning to external auditors.

Thoropass offers automated evidence gathering through 200+ auditor-vetted integrations, with the key distinction being that these integrations are pre-approved by the same auditors who will conduct the assessment. The platform includes AI-powered evidence review capabilities and ensures that automatically collected evidence meets audit standards from the start, eliminating the need for additional validation steps during the audit process.

Multi-Framework Support

Drata supports a broad range of frameworks including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, and newer regulations like AI-related frameworks (ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF). The platform offers both pre-mapped frameworks and requirement-only options, allowing organizations to customize their compliance approach. This breadth makes it suitable for organizations with diverse regulatory requirements.

Thoropass focuses on core frameworks including SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and HITRUST, advertising support for "30+ more" frameworks. The platform specializes in running single audit cycles across multiple frameworks simultaneously, leveraging its unified audit approach to reduce redundancy in multi-framework certifications. While the publicly listed framework coverage appears narrower than Drata, the integrated audit model can be more efficient for common enterprise frameworks.

Built-in Auditor

Drata provides an auditor directory and referral system but does not include audit services directly. Organizations must separately contract with external auditing firms, manage those relationships independently, and coordinate between the platform and auditor throughout the assessment process. While Drata's Audit Hub facilitates this collaboration, it still involves managing multiple vendor relationships.

Thoropass includes audit services as part of the platform subscription, with in-house auditors who are already familiar with the platform's capabilities and evidence collection methods. This eliminates the need to find, vet, and contract with separate audit firms, while ensuring seamless integration between compliance preparation and audit execution throughout the entire certification process.

Conclusion

Drata is well-suited for organizations that prefer flexibility in choosing their audit partners and need extensive framework coverage, particularly for newer regulations like AI governance frameworks. Its robust integration ecosystem and open API make it ideal for teams with complex technical environments who want powerful automation tools while maintaining control over their audit firm selection. The platform works best for established compliance teams comfortable managing multiple vendor relationships.

Thoropass is the better choice for organizations seeking vendor consolidation and streamlined audit experiences, particularly mid-market companies that want to avoid the complexity of coordinating between compliance platforms and separate audit firms. Thoropass has a significantly lower price tag because of the consolidation of audit and compliance into one platform. Although pricing does vary for each organization, initial scoping is representative of the true price tag. With traditional auditors and other compliance platforms, the price you get is only one side of the full price, since you'll need the other to complement its service. The all-in-one approach is especially valuable for teams pursuing multiple frameworks simultaneously or organizations that prioritize predictable, consolidated vendor management over maximum flexibility in audit firm selection.